For decades, union-busting bosses and Republican politicians have had a powerful ally in their war on organized labor: the United States Supreme Court.
The party needs to take its cue from America’s most celebrated leaders, who had no fear of talking directly to the public about the Constitution.
Over decades, a boutique of consultants, industrial psychologists, and specialist lawyers--spending an estimated $340 million a year--has played a significant role in subduing the labor movement, and has helped keep U.S. unions pinned down to this day.
How the Supreme Court has weaponized the Fourteenth Amendment and Brown v. Board of Education against antiracism. [A decision on SFFA v. Harvard, which was heard in October 2022, is pending as of January 29, 2023].
This book is a detailed critique of the judicial philosophy to which the current majority of the Supreme Court of the United States adheres.
Suggestions that the Supreme Court could adopt parts of the dangerous theory without upending elections are wrong.
Judge J. Michelle Childs' history of harsh criminal justice rulings contrast sharply with the background of another potential nominee, former public defender Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson.
"I come to this conclusion because I believe the current court threatens the democratic foundations of our nation," the senator said in an op-ed.
These emergency rulings – short, unsigned and issued without hearing oral arguments – undermine the public’s faith in the integrity of the court
The argument that court expansion is unconstitutional is weak, transparently political — and most importantly, wrong.
Spread the word