Frederick Douglass’s Unusual Book Tour (1845)
MAY 28 IS THE 180TH ANNIVERSARY of the publication of “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, Written By Himself”.
Before the book’s 1845 publication, Douglass had been known in eastern Massachusetts political circles as a powerful abolitionist orator. The appearance of his well-crafted autobiography, an instant best-seller that was quickly translated into French, German and Dutch, turned him into a public figure throughout North America and western Europe.
Having revealed that he was a self-emancipated slave who had fled the South less than seven years previously, Douglass soon became concerned that his former owner might attempt to use the Fugitive Slave Law to force him back to Maryland. Knowing he would be safe outside the U.S., he made the best of his new notoriety and sailed to Europe, where he embarked on an extended speaking tour of England, Ireland and Scotland.
Almost everywhere he went, standing-room-only crowds cheered his anti-slavery presentations. A group of his admirers, knowing that one reason he was among them was to avoid arrest, raised the funds needed to buy his freedom. Once the money was delivered to the former owner and the manumission papers filed in Baltimore, Douglass could return to the U.S., which he did 18 months after he had left. https://portside.org/2024-06-23/what-frederick-douglass-learned-irish-antislavery-activist-agitate-agitate-agitate
Andrew Johnson Goes His Own Way (1865)
MAY 29 IS THE 160TH ANNIVERSARY of President Andrew Johnson’s proclamation of an amnesty for virtually every southerner who had helped to plan and fight the Civil War. Johnson had become President in April 1865, when Lincoln was assassinated just a week after the war ended, leaving Johnson, who had been a slave owner until 1863, in charge of setting the policies for putting the Union back together.
Under Johnson’s leadership, efforts to limit the post-war power of those who had fought against the Union were largely unsuccessful, as were efforts to protect and support the millions of people who had so recently been emancipated, but who lacked any resources needed to determine their own future. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Johnson_and_slavery
Fight the Power (1975)
MAY 31 IS THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY of the release of the Isely Brothers’ hit single, “Fight the Power (Part 1 and Part 2)”, which was also the lead song on their hit album, “The Heat Is On.”
In the summer of 1975, I heard “Fight the Power” everywhere I went, which was appropriate, because the value of fighting the power was on the minds of a lot of people.
The Vietnamese people had just triumphed over the power of the USA and its allies after more than two decades of fierce fighting. The fight against the criminal Nixon gang that had been in control of the White House for six years was going better than had once seemed possible; Nixon had been forced to resign; many of his henchmen were either in jail for their crimes or about to start serving time; both the CIA and the FBI were getting the toughest going-over they had ever experienced, not only because of their connections to Watergate but because an outraged Congress was finally using its legislative and investigative powers to bring them to account; anti-war demonstrators who had brutally, and falsely arrested at Nixon’s orders were winning huge damage awards in federal courts.
Overseas, in addition to the USA’s defeat in Vietnam, the Portuguese people, who had emerged from more than four decades of facism, were nationalizing the banks and the insurance companies and granting independence to the progressive forces they had been fighting against in Africa.
Dancing to a song about fighting the power felt very right. You can listen to “Fight the Power” and the rest of “The Heat Is On” album here: https://youtu.be/NkToB8axhBY?si=kI4P169b11W07Zke
The ACLU Takes a Stand (1970)
JUNE 3 IS THE 55TH ANNIVERSARY of the American Civil Liberties Union’s declaration that the U.S. war against Vietnam was unconstitutional and call for the war’s “immediate termination.” Doing so was a major departure from tradition by the ACLU.
Up until 1970, the ACLU had always taken the position that the decision to go to war was a political, and not a legal question. But after several years of internal debate, the ACLU Board of Directors voted by an overwhelming majority that the lack of a Congressional declaration of war, as required by the Constitution, and the significant and widespread violations of the civil liberties of the war’s opponents in the U.S. had created a Constitutional crisis that could only be resolved by ending the war. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB11237
For more People's History, visit
Spread the word