Portside

Buried in a bill signed into law by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida this week is a provision that will eliminate Floridians' ability to use ranked-choice voting to decide their elections—as people in at least two cities there have voted to do—making DeSantis the latest GOP leader to ban the broadly popular voting reform.

As Common Dreams reported in March, Senate Bill 524 has been condemned by voting rights groups for creating a first-of-its-kind police force dedicated to investigating so-called "voter fraud" in the state. The law's attack on ranked-choice voting (RCV) has garnered less nationwide attention.

The law prohibits "the use of ranked-choice voting to determine election or nomination to elective office" and voids "existing or future local ordinances authorizing the use of ranked choice voting."

"There are a number of reasons Memphians voted multiple times to try RCV... Yet, the governor and legislature have chosen to tell Memphis voters: 'We don't care what you think, we know best.'"

Voters in the city of Clearwater had been set to vote on whether to use RCV in November, and 77% of Sarasota residents approved the use of the system for local elections in 2007—but those voters will now be forced to choose just one candidate in all elections unless S.B. 524 is repealed.

RCV is favored by six in 10 Americans, according to a recent poll by University of Maryland's Program for Public Consultation and Voice of the People. Nearly half of Republicans support the system, sometimes known as "instant runoff" voting, as well as 73% of Democrats and 55% of independents.

In a ranked-choice election, voters can rank all the candidates in order of their preference instead of choosing just one. If a candidate gets more than 50% of the vote in the first round, the election is over. If no one gets a majority of the first-round votes, the lowest-ranked candidate is eliminated and people who ranked that contender first have their votes redistributed to their second choice. The process continues until there is a winner with a clear majority.

Proponents of the system say it increases voter enthusiasm and turnout because it eliminates so-called "spoilers" and the pressure some voters feel to reject candidates who align with their ideology, for fear that the candidate can't win.

"If you want to keep voting for one person like you always have, that's totally fine!" explained nonpartisan election reform group Fair Vote on Thursday. "RCV just gives you backup choices in case your favorite can't win."

DeSantis' move comes nearly two months after Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, also a Republican, signed Senate Bill 1820, which also bans RCV, following a party-line vote on the measure.

The law was pushed by the GOP in response to two referendum votes in Memphis, where voters first approved RCV in 2008. The city council introduced another referendum in 2018 asking voters to repeal the system, but 62% of residents reaffirmed that they wanted to use RCV.

Republican lawmakers like state Sen. Brian Kelsey, who sponsored S.B. 1820, claimed the ban was a victory of "election integrity and ensuring voter clarity," while Steve Mulroy, a law professor at University of Memphis and author of Rethinking U.S. Election Law, called the law "deeply disappointing."

"Memphis voters chose two times to try this reform," Mulroy told The Well. "There are a number of reasons Memphians voted multiple times to try RCV... Yet, the governor and legislature have chosen to tell Memphis voters: 'We don't care what you think, we know best.'"

Maine and Alaska both use RCV for state-wide elections and more than 50 cities across the U.S. use the system for local elections.

"It's almost as if they don't care what voters think," Joshua Graham Lynn, co-founder of grassroots group Represent.Us, said of Republicans' efforts to stop voters from reforming their election systems.

Julia Conley is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Common Dreams. 

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

DONATE NOW